|

Earth has a deadline
|
The Core
(Paramount)
Premiere: March 28, 2003 (US)
Review by Ernest Lilley
Offical Website:
http://www.thecoremovie.com/
IMDb entry:
http://us.imdb.com/Title?0298814
|
The Core Facts:
The Dept. of Energy has a website that addresses some
Core Topics, including:
The Earth's Core doesn't spin, not much anyway,
and what spinning it does is caused by the Earth's magnetic
field, rather than the other way around. So the whole point of the
movie is bogus...but you expected that, right? Now you can stop
worrying about it and go back to wondering about time travel
paradoxes and whether space ships make noise
when they go by. If you still want to strike a blow for
science, go out and read a book on geology or something after the
movie. |
Directed by: Jon Amiel Writing
credits: Cooper Layne,
John Rogers (X)
Cast: Aaron Eckhart .... Josh Keyes /
Nicole Leroux .... Mother / Hilary
Swank .... Maj. Rebecca 'Beck' Childs / Delroy
Lindo .... Dr. Edward Brazleton / Stanley
Tucci .... Dr. Conrad Zimsky / DJ Qualls ....
Rat / Tchéky Karyo .... Sergei Leveque
/ Richard Jenkins (I) / Bruce Greenwood
(I) .... Col. Robert Iverson / Alfre Woodard
.... Stick
I knew it was dangerous going in. The signs
weren't promising and the science looked really bad. But I was going
through SF-Film withdrawal and none of that mattered. I had to see a
bunch of bright, heroic types save the world using nothing but an atomic
flashlight and a sonic-Swiss-army knife. Again.
I got that, and had a good time doing it. Not only is
The Core a classic B Sci-Fi movie, it's got an undercurrents of humor
and character development enough to make it fun and interesting. True,
the humor is handled more deftly than the personality conflicts...but
together they move things along. The producer's apply a
classic formula, if not a scientifically accurate one, in which
Government Scientists open Pandora's Box and a younger, more charismatic
scientist has to put the lid back on...before life on earth is wiped
out.
Here the bad idea is a gravity wave weapon that causes targeted
earthquakes, and it winds up stopping the rotation of the Earth's core
which strips the planet of its protective magnetic shield. See the
sidebar (The
Core Facts) and stop bothering me. Soon, electrical superstorms are
raging the planet and special effects are threatening everyone with a
pacemaker. How can we restart the core? In a classic
science fiction movie, we'd expect nuclear devices, and we wouldn't be
disappointed. Delivering them to the core is the heart of the movie, and
our intrepid team of "terranauts" suit up in
black suits that look much
cooler than those Pillsbury Doughboy NASA outfits to fly an untested ship to the center of the Earth.
But it's not about Earth Science, it's not about
Rocket Science, and it's certainly not about Thermodynamics...it's about
Chemistry. Between the characters, that is.
Hilary Swank
is the hyper-competent
Maj. Childs. She's never failed at anything she's tried, from emergency
shuttle landing to tying a Windsor knot in the hunky-scientist-lead's tie.
Will the core prove her Kobiashi Maru? Opposite her is Aaron Eckhart
as the really smart young scientist. Not only does he have a bunch of
liberal hang-ups about killing off crew members to get the mission done
to get over...he's got a classic scientist body...totally buff. Though
the chemistry between Swank and Eckhart bubbles along, they could use a
good catalyst to really get things hot, and wouldn't you think being
trapped at the Earth's Core would do the job? Stanley
Tucci is the pompous popular
scientist. He's got Carl Sagan's ego on steroids, but
still has sense of humor and some actual smarts. Then
there's Delroy Lindo as the humble, brilliant and
bypassed older
scientist, the one Tucci's character shafted all those years ago, and
now needed for the greater good. And lastly there's Rat, played by
DJ Qualls. Nerd-boy. Hacker Savant. Runs on
Zena tapes and Hot-Pockets. For a while I worried that they had just
thrown him in to pull in the 14yr old nerd demographic, as he seems
pretty peripheral to the plot...but they use him pretty well in the end.
In fact, they use everyone pretty well, though they use everyone pretty
much up, too.
Though I keep urging viewers not to worry about
the bad science, the most exciting sequence in the film is the emergency
shuttle landing. It's full of its own share of
head-shaking-wishful-thinking-psuedo-science, but it does have some great shots of a
de-orbiting shuttle. For all its faults, seeing the shuttle poised
against the backdrop of space is heart stopping stuff. Science
that no fiction can equal. To get that feeling, you might check out The Space Shuttle: A Photographic History by Phil Harrington (HCVR $19.95 Amazon) , with 100 photographs by Roger Ressmeyer (et al) and text by popular astronomy writer Phil Harrington
(currently Programs Director at Brookhaven
National Laboratory). I had fun at the
earth's core, good clean fun, and you can too...if you just enjoy all
the flashing lights and cool stuff and make bets on who's going to die
next with your friends. Take your kids and quiz them on the science
afterwards. Fun for the whole family. |