sfrevu Logo with link to Main Page  
The Name of the Wind: The Kingkiller Chronicle: Book 1 by Patrick Rothfuss
Review by John Berlyne
Gollancz Paperback  ISBN/ITEM#: 9780575081406
Date: 12 June 2008 List Price £8.99 Amazon US / Amazon UK /

Gollancz release the mass market edition of Patrick Rothfuss' effusively acclaimed fantasy début The Name of The Wind. I didn't care for this one all that much and though I firmly stick to my guns as to why it didn't appeal to me (my review is rerun in this issue), the novel was an undeniable hit with many of my fellow reviewers and certainly went down well with readers. A long-awaited follow up novel entitled Wise Man's Fear is in the pipeline for publication in April next year.

There has been plenty of hype surrounding Patrick Rothfuss's chunky debut fantasy, The Name of the Wind. The book received a lot of attention when it was published in the US by Daw Books last spring. The author's web site carries an open letter from Daw president and publisher Betsy Wollheim in which she states "...The Name of the Wind is the most brilliant first fantasy novel I have read in over thirty years as an editor..." Likewise, Gollancz, the publisher who now bring this book to a UK audience, have also been working hard to promote this title, animatedly enthusing about it on the grapevine and producing smart early proofs of this hefty work.

The Name of the Wind certainly conforms to what we expect of fat fantasy nowadays – firstly and foremost, it is indeed hefty – over 650 pages. Additionally it is medieval in the period setting – folks wondering around with swords, minstrels playing lutes; there is magic and dragons and taverns and ale and yokels and tinkers aplenty. This is not a novel that reinvents the wheel by any means.

Our protagonist is Kvothe, a character loaded from the start with legendary status –- here is a man who by reputation is a renowned thief and assassin, a practitioner of arcane magics, lover, storyteller, a man who has talked with Gods, we're told. However, rather frustratingly, we actually get to see very little of this in the course of the novel, instead, the Kvothe we actually meet at first is a lowly, mild-mannered innkeeper, a kind of superhero in the guise of his secret identity. In what is a clunky, sluggish start to the novel, Rothfuss uses a filmic convention – introducing Kvothe and then using flashbacks to tell of his deeds. In doing this he frequently switches narrative perspective, telling the vast majority of the story "voice-over" style. There's nothing wrong with this per se, but the switches between third and first person, for me at least were unsettling and unnecessary. Why not just start at the beginning, picaresque style?

Kvothe is an engaging and undeniably interesting character, every inch the archetypal quick-witted and resourceful fantasy hero. We learn of his origins, born into a troupe of respectable strolling players, he develops talents early on for acting and an affinity with the great works of his culture. Rothfuss is very skilful in his creation of the internal myths of this world. An entire classical literature exists - plays, books, songs, and Kvothe knows them all. Much of these stories (and clearly Rothfuss is a lover of stories and their innate power over us) are spawned from legends that have long passed out of living memory, including that of The Chadrian, dark demonic things that lurk on the edges of reality, monsters from songs sung to children to temper their bad behaviour. To avoid spoilers, I'll be vague, but basically, catastrophe strikes and Kvothe becomes tied to and obsessed by the story of the Chadrian. The legend itself develops into the main long-term story arc of Rothfuss's novel, driving Kvothe onwards and providing him with his primary motivates.

We follow this young boy through his years as a street urchin in a dangerous city, towards the achievement of his goal of enrolling in the university, where he proceeds to study the various branches of the mystical arts. His real motive however is to gain access to the institution's huge and ancient library in the hope of learning more of The Chadrian. The bulk of the novel concerns the various adventures that occur during Kvothe's time as a student. We have our boy, parents killed by an ancient dark magic, himself gifted in the magical arts, running into trouble with a nasty teacher, we have him locking horns with a bullying aristocratic contemporary whom he bests with wit and a little luck, we have him mentored by a kindly, eccentric and unfathomable wizard... hang on, doesn't this all sound a bit familiar? Perhaps I'm searching for commonalities here and certainly there are plenty of elements where Rothfuss is not echoing whatever else might be dominating the market nowadays, but one can't help but notice the similarities.

More of an issue for me though is the way in which The Name of the Wind fails to adequately resolve its plot lines. When one takes on a huge book like this, I feel there's a bargain being struck between reader and author. It might not take the same amount of time to read 650 pages as it does to write them, but it is still a creative endeavour on our part. The reader must work to conjure up the events described and one does expect at least some sense of closure on turning the final page. It seems to me that currently there is change going on in fantasy – the concept of the trilogy is being redefined. It used to be that such a sequence of novels would tell three separate, but linked and above all complete stories, events overlapping and influencing each other, but with each narrative having a definitive and satisfying resolution at the end. This is not so with The Name of the Wind. It's interesting that rather than calling it "Book One" it is subtitled "The Kingkiller Chronicle: Day One" – but this does not mitigate the fact that it is reads as the long first act in a story split three ways and the impression it left me with, after 650 pages, was of something unfinished and therefore unsatisfying.


Our Reader's Respond

From: Jason
I dont exactly agree with your review but I can definitely see how you were unsatifised with the ending. I agree that the ending did seem a little unfinished but at the same time I feel that I kept me wanting to read more.This is the best book I have read my whole life and I highly recommend it!

Return to Index


We're interested in your feedback. Just fill out the form below and we'll add your comments as soon as we can look them over. Due to the number of SPAM containing links, any comments containing links will be filtered out by our system. Please do not include links in your message.
Name:
Email:
Comments

© 2002-2014SFRevu

advertising index / info
Our advertisers make SFRevu possible, and your consideration is appreciated.

  © 2002-2014SFRevu