sfrevu Logo with link to Main Page  
Steven Spielberg May Get $825 Million, Including $325 Million From India's Anil Ambani by Mehul Srivastava
Review by Charles Mohapel
BusinessWeek.com, IMDB.com, Wikipedia News  ISBN/ITEM#: CM090716SSMGAA
Date: 16 July 2009

Links: BusinessWeek.com Article / IMDB.com - Steven Spielberg / Wikipedia - Steven Spielberg / Show Official Info /

And no, Spielberg won't be making Bollywood masala films. Instead, this huge chunk of change will allow DreamWorks to finance Spielberg's penchant for expensive box office hits. Since DreamWorks broke up its relationship with Viacom's Paramount Pictures in late 2008, the studio hasn't released a single film, but has been working on some.

Now, Spielberg could produce as many as 8 films from the money, and Indian newspapers were rife with speculations about the plots. A secret-service-kidnapped president drama, asked the Times of India? Another Close Encounters of The Third Kind?

Of course, the normal caveats apply, Reliance Big Entertainment's CEO, Amit Khanna, said in a conference call with reporters. The deal is not final, the number is open to change, but most likely go upwards, since Reliance had originally agreed to match Spielberg's fundraising up to $550 million. Right now, Ambani will put in $325 million to match the $325 million that JP Morgan and other banks are putting up. Disney's $150 million gives it the worldwide distribution rights for any films produced with this money, except for India, where Reliance will own all domestic rights.

India's embrace of Hollywood has been more enthusiastic than the United States' taste for Bollywood fare. In 2007, the Hindi-dubbed version of Spiderman 3 was the largest grossing film in India, but Indian films with western actors (Sylvester Stallone showed up in one, Denise Richards in another) haven't done well overseas. Warner Bros went the other way producing Indian films for Indian audiences, and has had mixed success is 2008 marquee attempt, Chandni Chowk to China (a reference to a famous market in Delhi), a potboiler comedy that combined all the crowd-pleasing elements of lighter Bollywood fare twins separated at birth, a poor hero dreaming of a big break, comedy, action, and a torrid romance didn't do that well, even with two of India's biggest film stars in the lead roles.

It makes sense for Reliance to go in the other direction; Indian box office receipts will be about $4 billion in 2012, whereas U.S. box office sales in 2008 were twice that, according to the National Association of Theater Owners.

The Ambani-Spielberg saga has been long in the making. Spielberg's frustrations with Paramount and his long-drawn-out escape from his contract was made possible by Ambani's decision to consider funding future movies for DreamWorks.

Ambani's BIG Entertainment has already invested in a slew of Hollywood star projects, announcing at the 2008 Cannes Film Festival that it had agreed to invest in projects that involved George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Tom Hanks, and Jim Carrey. No films have been produced as a result of that arrangement, and the amount of money pledged is still unknown. The Indian Express, citing unnamed sources, said it could be as much a $1 billion.

Ambani's love for Bollywood is well-known in India. His wife, Tina Ambani, was a Bollywood star in the early 80's, and into the 90's, and he counts Bollywood stars amongst his friends (On the other hand, what Bollywood star would NOT want to be friends with one of the world's richest people).

But this investment is all business, Ambani indicated in the conference call. "It's a game changer," he said, sticking closely to a script that his associates had repeated through the day that this investment would allow one of India's largest corporate houses to reach out to young people around the world.

Return to Index


We're interested in your feedback. Just fill out the form below and we'll add your comments as soon as we can look them over. Due to the number of SPAM containing links, any comments containing links will be filtered out by our system. Please do not include links in your message.
Name:
Email:
Comments

© 2002-2017SFRevu

advertising index / info
Our advertisers make SFRevu possible, and your consideration is appreciated.

  © 2002-2017SFRevu